Skip to main content

Henry IV part I by William Shakespeare Summary

William Shakespeare – a brief biography

William Shakespeare was born on 23 April 1564 to John and Mary Shakespeare at Stratford- upon-Avon. He went to King’s New School, a local grammar school, and is said to have left  formal education at the age of fifteen or sixteen. Nothing much is known about his life from  1585 to 1590s and these years are hence termed “the lost years”. His emergence as a  playwright took place during the 1590s and by 1598, Shakespeare was renowned for writing  tragedy, comedy and history plays, besides poetry. He flourished as a playwright through the  Elizabethan and Jacobean ages, and died in 1616. The first anthology of his works, known as  the first folio, was published posthumously, in 1623.

 

The story

A play in five acts, the first scene of Henry IV, Part I begins with a conversation between the  King, Westmoreland and Sir Walter Blunt in the palace. The King begins his dialogue with  an acknowledgement of the disturbances which threaten the throne after Richard II, and  which continue to pose a constant danger to the monarchy. He proposes to join the Holy  Crusades against the Islamic people to reclaim the Holy Land: “...Therefore, friends,/ As far  as to the sepulchre of Christ, - / Whose soldier now, under whose blessed cross/ We are  impressed and engaged to fight, -/ Forthwith a power of English shall we levy”. His proposal,  however, is interrupted by the news of raging rebels who continue to grow increasingly  hostile towards the King and his throne, especially Thomas Percy, with whose help Henry IV  had acquired the rule of England by disposing Richard II.

 

In the same scene, he is informed by Westmoreland about the battle between Harry Percy  (Hotspur) and a large army of Scots, which the former has won. He, however, has refused to  hand over the war captives to the King except one, which is a direct violation of war  conventions, whereby the King has the first claim to the captives of war. After the King’s  articulation of the state of unrest prevailing in England, this dialogue foregrounds the latent  tension within the nation and makes it the main subject of the entire play hereafter. The scene  ends with the King comparing the achievements of Hotspur with his son Prince Henry (Hal)  who indulges in merrymaking with a group of common people headed by the Sir John Falstaff and shows no sense of responsibility towards his royal lineage.

 

In the second scene of the same act, based in a tavern, the audience get the first glimpse of  Hal planning a highway robbery with Sir John Falstaff and Pointz. In the concluding  soliloquy of the scene, Hal states the reason behind opting for the lifestyle he has chosen for  himself: “By so much shall I falsify men’s hopes; And, like bright metal on a sullen ground, /  My reformation glittering o’er my fault,/ Shall show more goodly and attract more eyes/  Than that which it hath no foil to set it off”. The first act concludes with a scene based in the palace again where Hotspur displays outright insolence towards the King and leaves with the  declaration of a war.

The second act comprises four scenes – three based on the humorous subplot of the highway  robbery planned by Hal and Sir John Falstaff, as Hal and Pointz play a practical joke upon  Falstaff. As a contrast against the first act which culminates in the anticipation of a war, the  second act, through the misadventures and jokes of John Falstaff and his witty conversation  with Hal as a rehearsal for what the latter shall say to the King when asked about his  misdeeds, ushers in a note of comic relief. The scene, however, concludes as Hal assumes his  responsibility as a prince and declares “I’ll to the court in the morning. We must all to the wars...”

Act three comprises three scenes and is instrumental in the reshaping of the character of Hal.  The first scene is based in the rebels’ camp as they strategize their moves in the upcoming war and leave for the battlefield. The second scene portrays the vital meeting between theKing and Hal. King Henry IV reprimands his son for indulging in such low company and base deeds which do not become his royal blood. He says: “Could such inordinate and low desires, / Such poor, such base, such lewd, such mean attempts, / Such barren pleasures, rude society, / As thou art matched withal and grafted to, / Accompany the greatness of thy blood, / And hold their level with thy princely heart?” In response to this, Hal assures his father, “I will redeem all this on Percy’s head”. He assures the King that he will defeat Hotspur in the battle and establish his own worth in the eyes of his father and his countrymen. The concluding scene of this act is based in the tavern where John Falstaff is holding a conversation with the hostess. Hal enters the scene as a transformed individual and declares his intention of joining the war to Falstaff and Pointz. The act concludes with Hal strategizing his own moves in the war and his inclusion of John Falstaff in the same.

The last two acts of the play are based in the battlefield at Shrewsbury, as both the camps plan and execute their share in the battle. In these two acts, the dramatic tension is built by the playwright through the continuous portrayal of the two camps and their strategies, while humour is also brought in by the deeds of Sir John Falstaff, who refuses to change his behavioural pattern – whether in the tavern or the battlefield. Contrasted against the valour of the other soldiers and nobles, Falstaff continues the comic element in the history play despite the grave subject matter it deals with.

In the fifth act, Hal is established in front of the audience as a worthy claimant of the English throne through his heroic deeds and slaying of Hotspur in a single combat. He saves King Henry in the second scene, thereby earning his father’s approval and displaying in himself that ideal related to the royal blood which formed the foundation of the honour of the King. The play concludes with a further consolidation of the royal virtues in Hal, as after the news of victory, he commands that Archibald should be set free without any ransom despite being a prisoner of the war, and moves on to raise a new war against Owen Glendower and the other rebels – which King Henry IV, Part II would deal with.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

You May Also Like

SCHOOLS OF COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

Introduction : Ø   Comparative Literature was established in France during the 19 th century as an academic discipline : France   1816 Ø   It reached America only during the 20 th century through the German scholars who migrated to America from Hitler’s Germany The French School : Ø   In the French sense of Comparative Literature, it is the moral responsibility of every French Comparatist to trace and relate the world literary experience to the French literary response because , according to him, the French literature is the backbone of the universal literary system Ø   Therefore, they were interested in analysing the external sources and influence of works. In the French School, Comparative Literature becomes an ancillary discipline in the field of French literary history Ø   The French school   was too narrow and relied too heavily on factual evidence Ø   It argued that Comparative literature ought to involve the study of two elements ( two different languages) Ø  
Post a Comment
Read more

THEMATOLOGY IN COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

Introduction v   Thematology or study of themes is a new area in the field of comparative literature. It was introduced by the famous American comparatist, Harry Levin. It was he who coined the term ‘Thematics’ or ‘Thematology’ v   Thematology is a comparative study of literary works as they relate to other literary works as far as the themes are concerned Themes and Motifs Thematology involves the study of ‘themes’ and ‘motifs’ . Both are basically different but modern literary critics use them as interchangeable terms. A motif is a recurring element in a work of art. It may be an incident or a device or a formula. For example, folklores have a common motif of a ugly woman becoming a charming princess. Another common motif is bemoaning of the bygone past in lyrics. The ‘theme’ is a recurrent element but it is related to the subject-matter to both form and content Motif vs Theme The theme is the central idea or message where as the motif constitutes the unit from which th
Post a Comment
Read more

NATIONAL, COMPARATIVE AND WORLD LITERATURE

  “Literature in English” is a common one that encompasses all literature written in English, regardless of the citizenship of the author Classification is essential to distinguish Comparative Literature from National Literature, General Literature, and World Literature   National Literature Two contradictory explanations…. 1. National literature  is produced by the people of a state, in the language of that people. For example, the Tamil literature, written in Tamil and by a Tamilian is accepted as National Literature. This is a narrow sense which excludes Tamil literature produced in countries like Sri Lanka, Malaysia and other countries National literature is the literature produced by citizens of a particular nation. It's one way of grouping literature (e.g., American literature, British literature, French literature, and Indian English literature) 2. Many comparitists accept all writings produced by those people who share the same culture and language though they
Post a Comment
Read more